tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post2868125020226877466..comments2011-10-12T23:11:01.777+05:30Sanjiva Weerawaranahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10278760563625840210noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post-35116125735886113412011-10-12T23:11:01.777+05:302011-10-12T23:11:01.777+05:30<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Unpublished-Phone-Number-Lookup---Find-Out-the-Identity-of-Your-Wifes-Lover&amp;id=4664636" rel="nofollow">reverse phone lookup</a>johniehhttp://johnieh.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post-23470579551552198502008-09-23T09:13:00.000+05:302008-09-23T09:13:00.000+05:30Hi Tammo,<BR/><BR/>The manner in which I have implemented this on the WSO2 Mashup Server is very similar to what JAX-RS could do.<BR/><BR/>I think your confusion is using WSDL 2.0 in a contract first manner. Where you write the WSDL first and then generate the code for it. Well I don't see any difference in these two approaches, cause the ultimate result is the same (You use a WSDL 2.0 document to describe a RESTfull service). <BR/><BR/>Hope this makes things clear to you.Keith Chapmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17984975074729516057noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post-48827608743672860802008-09-16T22:59:00.000+05:302008-09-16T22:59:00.000+05:30I'm not in the REST camp but I'm a bit confused... Do I understand it right that Keith's approach describes the access to a HTTP resource in terms of WSDL 2.0? I understand approaches like JAX-RS where Java classes are exposed as resources by mapping representations and verbs to annotated Java methods, but I'm getting confused if it's turned the other way 'round. I always thought the main benefit of a RESTful accessing scheme is that the semantics of the verbs are well defined and always clear. That should make the world more easy. What a "GET /customers" does is actually clear. If I understand Keith correctly, these (verb, resource) tuples are now mapped back to (remote) procedures so that I describe the access to resources in an actually less meaningful manner. Less meaningful because the semantics of operations are somewhat undefined. <BR/>Or am I missing something?<BR/><BR/>Cheers, TammoTammohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01177066995521548311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post-16911126497873519472008-09-16T20:34:00.000+05:302008-09-16T20:34:00.000+05:30What can I say .. I'm a glutton for punishment ;-). Seriously though, I'd really like to see the holes that the REST camp identifies - obviously with the ulterior motive of wanting to fix those!Sanjiva Weerawaranahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10278760563625840210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-439652399294426401.post-1004491479332561282008-09-16T19:51:00.000+05:302008-09-16T19:51:00.000+05:30You're just asking for it.... :-)Dan Diephousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07708942179017774256noreply@blogger.com